When Online Connection Becomes Exploitation: A Clinical Perspective on PnP Rooms and Cam Sites
* * *
By Joseph W. LaFleur Jr., LICSW, MBA
Clinical Director, District Counseling and Psychotherapy
Specializing in LGBTQ+ Mental Health, Trauma, and Psychedelic Integration
Categories: LGBTQ+ Mental Health, Substance Use, Digital Safety, Chemsex, Harm Reduction, Online Exploitation
SEO Title: PnP Rooms & Cam Sites: Clinical Warning About Online Exploitation | LGBTQ+ Therapy DC
Meta Description: Licensed clinical social worker examines how PnP video chat rooms, Telegram groups, and adult cam sites like Stripchat and Chaturbate exploit LGBTQ+ professionals through substance use, financial manipulation, and data vulnerability. Research-backed clinical guide.
* * *
Introduction
Over the past three years working in private practice with LGBTQ+ clients, I have noticed an alarming pattern: intelligent, professionally successful individuals—therapists, healthcare workers, social workers—finding themselves trapped in online ecosystems they cannot seem to leave. These are not people with poor judgment. They are people whose professional strengths are being weaponized against them by sophisticated exploitation networks.
This article examines what is happening in “Party and Play” (PnP) video chat rooms and their connection to adult webcam platforms, based on clinical observation and documented research about online exploitation, substance use neuroscience, and the unique vulnerabilities faced by sexual minority men.
The clinical landscape is significant. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis encompassing 238 studies and more than 380,000 participants found a pooled chemsex prevalence of 22% among men who have sex with men, with sexualized methamphetamine use at 8% globally (Poulios et al., 2025). In the United Kingdom, a 2025 study of MSM engaging in chemsex found that 47.5% used methamphetamine and 17% reported intravenous drug use, with nearly half meeting clinical criteria for anxiety (Hibbert et al., 2025). These are not fringe behaviors. This is a public health crisis unfolding in digital spaces that most clinicians, families, and partners know nothing about.
* * *
What Are PnP Rooms and Cam Sites?
PnP Rooms are video chat spaces organized through Telegram and hosted on platforms like Zoom, where participants use methamphetamine while socializing or engaging in sexual activities. The term “party and play” has been used in clinical literature since at least 2005 and appears in peer-reviewed research indexed by the National Library of Medicine (Maxwell et al., 2019). Features of these rooms include “slamming” sessions (group video where participants inject methamphetamine), “pointing” events (coordinated group sexual activities), social mixing while using substances, and performer showcases.
Adult Cam Sites like Stripchat and Chaturbate operate on a token-based system. Users purchase tokens (virtual currency) at approximately $10 to $100 or more per package, spending them on private shows, tips, and specific requested acts. Private or exclusive shows cost 30 to 90 tokens per minute, with models promising specific acts for set tip amounts.
Many participants move between these ecosystems. Models recruit customers in PnP rooms, and PnP room attendees discover cam models and spend tokens on them. The two systems function as mutually reinforcing loops—substance use fuels spending, and the social validation of the rooms fuels continued substance use.
* * *
The Clinical Pattern
In my practice, clients who become caught in these ecosystems share remarkably similar trajectories. What follows is a composite drawn from multiple clinical encounters—not a single individual’s story—that illustrates the progression documented in chemsex research.
Phase 1: Initial Appeal
Clients describe finding genuine LGBTQ+ community and acceptance, experiencing sexual expression without judgment, receiving immediate validation and attention, and connecting with others who understand substance use. Research confirms these motivations: a 2024 meta-ethnography found that men who have sex with men commonly engage in chemsex to achieve increased libido, reduced inhibitions, enhanced intimacy, and coping with sexuality and HIV status (Lasco & Yu, 2023; Weatherburn et al., 2017). Broader psychosocial factors including social stigma, minority stress, and the desire to escape have been consistently identified as drivers of sexualized drug use (Carrico et al., 2024).
Phase 2: Gradual Escalation
Spending increases on cam site tokens ($50 to $500 or more per session). Clients create multiple accounts and personas across platforms. Substance use increases in frequency and potency, with progression to injection use to maintain participation. Professional work begins to suffer and career development is neglected. A UK study found that among methamphetamine users engaging in chemsex, 41.8% reported weekly consumption, and intravenous drug use was most frequently reported among those engaging weekly (Hibbert et al., 2025).
Phase 3: Recognition of Manipulation
Clients notice identical manipulation patterns across “different” rooms. They discover the same moderators appearing in multiple rooms. Information shared in one room surfaces in another. They experience targeted harassment or sudden exclusion. Models manipulate or fail to deliver promised content. Research on coordinated inauthentic behavior on Telegram has documented networks of channels masquerading as separate entities while sharing administrators and coordinating content (Cresci et al., 2017).
Phase 4: The Trap
Clients cannot stop despite recognizing problems. They “need to understand” the system before leaving. They create new accounts to “investigate.” They cannot leave without “complete information.” Shame prevents seeking help or telling partners. Professional licensure becomes at risk. Minority Stress Theory, the dominant framework for understanding LGBTQ+ health disparities, explains how intersectional stigma negatively impacts treatment engagement, leading to avoidance of help-seeking or poor treatment outcomes (Meyer, 2003; Chen & Fang, 2023).
* * *
Why Smart People Get Caught
The clients I see are typically healthcare professionals—nurses, doctors, therapists—highly educated with advanced degrees, trained in recognizing manipulation, financially stable, and generally demonstrating good judgment. The question clinicians ask: Why does expertise not protect them?
1. Substance Use Impairs Real-Time Recognition
Nearly every client reports the same phenomenon: “When I review recordings later, I can see the manipulation clearly. But in the moment, I don’t see it.”
This is not a failure of intelligence. It is neuroscience. A 2019 systematic review in Drug and Alcohol Dependenceconfirmed that methamphetamine users perform more poorly than controls across all cognitive domains—psychomotor function, working memory, attention, cognitive control, and decision-making—with the strongest deficits in cognitive control and decision-making specifically (Sabrini et al., 2019). A separate review by Mizoguchi and Yamada (2019) found that methamphetamine impairs executive function, attention, social cognition, flexibility, and working memory, with altered decision-making contributing to high relapse rates even after prolonged withdrawal.
Critically, a 2020 study by Fitzpatrick and colleagues in Drug and Alcohol Dependence demonstrated that methamphetamine dependence was specifically associated with poorer decision-making and disinhibition independent of other factors including intelligence, cannabis use, alcohol use, and depression (Fitzpatrick et al., 2020). The drug specifically targets the cognitive functions needed to recognize exploitation while it is happening.
2. Legitimate Needs Are Being Met
These spaces meet real psychological needs: LGBTQ+ community (often unavailable or limited in person), sexual expression without judgment, validation and attention, escape from professional pressure, and connection with others who understand substance use. These needs are genuine. The spaces partially fulfill them. That is what makes disengagement so difficult.
Research consistently identifies that drug and alcohol use among LGBTQ+ populations may be linked to community bonding and identity formation—historically, bars and clubs were among the only social spaces where people could meet openly. Smartphone technology has extended this dynamic, with geolocation apps making it easy to find sexual partners and substance-using social spaces (BMJ, 2024). The legitimate need for community becomes the entry point for exploitation.
3. Room Networks Appear Separate but Function as One
Multiple clients report: “What appear to be competing, independent rooms seem to share moderators and coordinate information.” Telegram’s architecture makes this trivially easy. The platform allows creation of interconnected channels with minimal content moderation, and research has documented coordinated networks of channels operating under the appearance of independence (Cresci et al., 2017). You cannot escape harassment or manipulation by switching rooms. The ecosystem follows you.
4. Professional Training Becomes a Vulnerability
Clinicians, researchers, and systems-trained professionals face a specific trap: they are trained to “understand systems before intervening.” Professional analytical skills rationalize continued investigation. “I need the complete picture” becomes the justification for continued engagement. Their greatest professional strength is weaponized against their personal safety.
5. Shame and Stigma Enable Isolation
LGBTQ+ professionals face unique barriers to help-seeking. They cannot discuss this with colleagues (professional reputation risk), cannot report to authorities (substance use, sexual content involvement), cannot tell family (stigma around sexuality and drug use), cannot access support (licensing concerns), and cannot tell partners (shame, fear of judgment).
A 2023 scoping review in Global Public Health found that Minority Stress Theory is the dominant framework for understanding these barriers: increased substance use as a coping strategy is directly associated with minority stress, and intersectional stigma negatively impacts treatment experiences, leading to avoidance of help-seeking (Chen & Fang, 2023). A study in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors found that shame-proneness was positively related to problematic alcohol and drug use among sexual minority men and women, while shame and internalized heterosexism were directly related to each other (Allen & Oleson, 2013). Isolation perpetuates the trap.
* * *
Documented Harms
Substance Use Escalation
Participation in these rooms effectively requires substances—sober engagement is rare and socially penalized. Tolerance builds rapidly, with progression to injection use (“slamming”) to maintain the intensity required for participation. Health risks include HIV, Hepatitis C, bacterial infections, and overdose (CDC, 2022). The 2025 UK chemsex study found that intravenous drug use was most common among those engaging in weekly chemsex, at 54.2%, compared to 12.5% among those engaging monthly or less frequently (Hibbert et al., 2025). Professional impairment follows directly from increased use.
Financial Exploitation
Token purchases accumulate rapidly—$50 to $500 or more per session. Under substance influence, financial judgment is impaired in ways documented by neuroscience research (Fitzpatrick et al., 2020). Models may manipulate or fail to deliver promised content. Some clients report spending $2,000 to $5,000 monthly. The token system creates psychological distance from real money, functioning much like casino chips—a design feature, not a coincidence.
Data Security Risk
In November 2021, Stripchat suffered one of the largest data breaches ever to hit an adult entertainment platform. Security researcher Volodymyr Diachenko of Comparitech discovered an unsecured Elasticsearch database containing approximately 200 million records. The exposed data included 65 million user records with email addresses, IP addresses, tip amounts, and account activity timestamps; 421,000 model records with usernames, gender, studio IDs, and pricing; 134 million transaction records; and 719,000 chat messages (Diachenko, 2021; Bracken, 2021).
As Diachenko warned at the time, this data puts both users and models at risk of extortion, violence, and harassment—both online and offline. Indeed, police in Mumbai, India arrested suspects connected to a Stripchat sextortion ring who were blackmailing victims through information accessed via the platform (SecureWorld, 2021). The privacy risk becomes significantly more dangerous when exposed information is cross-referenced with other data breaches to construct full profiles of individuals.
On Telegram, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) documented over 100 self-reported sextortion cases originating on the platform within a single six-month period in 2023 (NCOSE, 2024). The FBI reported receiving over 13,000 reports of online financial sextortion between October 2021 and March 2023, with at least 20 resulting suicides and a 20% increase in reporting over the following year (FBI, 2024). The Federal Trade Commission noted that 40% of 2022 romance scam losses involved WhatsApp, Google Chat, or Telegram as contact platforms (FTC, 2023).
Professional Risk
Time away from career development, impaired judgment affecting clinical work, licensing board concerns if discovered, creating performer accounts that increase visibility risk, real identity exposure on adult platforms, and visitors from rooms knowing home addresses—each of these represents a distinct threat to professional standing that compounds over time.
Psychological Impact
Clients present with compulsive behavior patterns, difficulty disengaging despite recognizing harm, delayed recognition of manipulation, increasing paranoia about being targeted, social isolation from real-world connections, and complex trauma from coordinated targeting. The 2025 UK study found that 49.9% of chemsex-engaged participants met criteria for anxiety, with a significant association between abnormal anxiety scores and chemsex frequency (Hibbert et al., 2025). Chemsex has also been associated with depression, malnutrition, dehydration, and reduced adherence to both PrEP and antiretroviral therapy (Poulios et al., 2025).
* * *
Red Flags You May Be in Too Deep
Professional self-assessment:
□ Checking platforms compulsively throughout the day
□ Spending significant money on cam site tokens
□ Professional work suffering
□ Substance use increasing in frequency or potency
□ Seeing manipulation on review but not in real-time
□ Creating multiple accounts or personas
□ Experiencing conflicts on these platforms regularly
□ Feeling you “can’t leave without understanding”
□ Attempted to stop but could not
□ Keeping this secret from people who care about you
□ Feeling watched or targeted
□ Using “investigation” or “research” as justification to stay engaged
□ Allowing people from rooms into your home
□ Substance use increased significantly since joining
If you checked several boxes, professional help is appropriate.
* * *
What Actually Happens in These Networks
The “Slamming” Culture
Injection drug use in video group settings creates intense bonding through shared risk, peer pressure to participate in riskier behaviors, health vulnerability (injection-related infections, overdose), stronger physical and psychological dependence, and power dynamics between those who “slam” and those who do not. The 2024 meta-analysis found that intravenous methamphetamine use is specifically associated with syringe sharing, dramatically elevating HIV and Hepatitis C transmission risk (Lodge et al., 2024; Rezaei et al., 2020).
Financial Exploitation Through Cam Sites
Models may promise specific acts for tip amounts and then not deliver. Substance-impaired judgment leads to overspending. “One more private show” becomes a compulsive pattern. The token system creates psychological distance from real money. Models may work coordinated rooms—the same individuals appearing across platforms under different identities.
Information Gathering
Some visitors exhibit suspicious patterns: obsessive discussion of “security risks” and “surveillance,” excessive talk about dangers in rooms during sexual encounters, stalling sexual activity to continue these discussions, not respecting boundaries when asked to stop, and attempting to return repeatedly after being declined.
In psychoanalytic terms, obsessive discussion of surveillance during inappropriate contexts may represent projection—talking obsessively about something the person is guilty of or involved in themselves. This warrants clinical attention and boundary protection.
* * *
What This Ecosystem Actually Is
These are not primarily “harm reduction spaces” or casual adult recreation. The evidence, taken together, points to something more concerning:
Organized Networks. Multiple clients report identical patterns across supposedly independent rooms. Telegram’s architecture facilitates coordinated channel networks that can easily masquerade as independent operations (Cresci et al., 2017).
Exploitation Infrastructure. Token-based cam sites combined with substance-using participant pools combined with data breach vulnerabilities create a targeting system for financial exploitation and sextortion. The Stripchat breach alone exposed 65 million user records (Diachenko, 2021).
Health Risk Creation. Rooms that normalize injection use create health risks and dependence that bind participants. Chemsex prevalence stands at 22% among MSM globally, with methamphetamine-specific use at 8%—numbers representing hundreds of thousands of individuals (Poulios et al., 2025).
Criminal Activity. The FBI received over 13,000 sextortion reports in an 18-month period, with documented operations on Telegram (FBI, 2024). NCOSE identified Telegram as the number one messaging platform used to search for, view, and share exploitative material (NCOSE, 2024).
This does not mean grand conspiracy or that everyone involved is coordinated. It means real exploitation networks exist, are operational, and target vulnerable populations.
* * *
Why You Cannot “Just Leave”
Compulsive engagement is not a character flaw. It results from the convergence of neurochemical, psychological, and social factors that research has documented extensively.
The compulsion disguises itself as: “I’m just researching.” “I need to understand before I leave.” “I’m warning others.” “This is my community.”
The actual hooks are: Substance use lowers resistance through documented impairment of decision-making and inhibitory control (Mizoguchi & Yamada, 2019). Legitimate needs for community and validation are partially met. Financial investment creates sunk cost. Injection use creates stronger physical dependence. Social bonding creates obligation. And shame—the central mechanism of minority stress—prevents help-seeking (Meyer, 2003; Allen & Oleson, 2013).
This is why professional help is necessary—and appropriate.
* * *
If This Describes You: What to Do
Step 1: Recognize You Need Help
This is not weakness. This is recognizing that compulsive behavior requires professional intervention, that substance use needs treatment (especially injection use), that your analytical skills are being used against you, and that professional help is necessary and appropriate.
Step 2: Protect Your Professional License
If you are a licensed healthcare professional, contact your state’s professional health monitoring program. These exist for physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and lawyers. Self-refer before there is a complaint. These programs are usually confidential and protective, demonstrate responsibility and insight, and protect your license while you get help. Search: “[Your state] [Your profession] health monitoring program.”
Step 3: Get Appropriate Treatment
You need a therapist experienced with compulsive behaviors, LGBTQ+ issues, substance use disorder (especially stimulants), injection drug use (if applicable), behavioral addiction, and high-functioning professionals. Effective treatments include ERP (Exposure Response Prevention) to learn to tolerate uncertainty without acting on compulsive urges, substance use treatment at the appropriate level of care, medical supervision (essential if injecting), HIV and Hepatitis C testing, and therapy for compulsive behavior.
Step 4: Complete Disengagement
Not reduction. Complete disengagement: delete all accounts, exit all Telegram channels, delete apps, block websites if helpful, and tell someone you trust for accountability. The “need to understand” is the trap. You can leave with incomplete information.
Step 5: Address Root Needs
Work with your therapist on where to find healthy LGBTQ+ community, how to process being targeted and manipulated, what professional goals you have neglected, how to rebuild after substance use, and what authentic sexual and relational connection looks like.
Step 6: Build an Alternative Life
Local LGBTQ+ community centers, sober or sober-friendly social spaces, professional peer support, harm reduction services (if not ready for abstinence), and recovery community (NA, SMART Recovery, and similar programs).
* * *
For Partners and Friends
If someone you care about is caught in this pattern:
Do not tell them they are paranoid (some observations may be accurate), minimize their experience, say “just stop” (it is not that simple), shame them, or dismiss their concerns about manipulation.
Do take their distress seriously, validate that these spaces are harmful, encourage professional help, help find appropriate treatment, support complete disengagement, understand this is compulsive behavior and not moral failure, help with testing if injection use occurred, and do not allow visitors from these ecosystems into your shared home.
The goal is help-seeking, not judgment.
* * *
About “Exposing” or “Investigating”
Some people trapped in this ecosystem want to expose who is behind the operation, investigate the full structure, or save others by understanding it completely.
Important reality check: First, it is the compulsion talking. “Investigating” justifies continued engagement. “Exposing” rationalizes not leaving. This is not your job or responsibility. Second, you are not equipped. Law enforcement has resources you do not. Continued exposure increases your risk. Substance use impairs investigative accuracy. Your professional license is at stake.
What actually helps: Report what you know to the FBI (tips.fbi.gov or ic3.gov). Then completely disengage. Get yourself healthy. Help your actual clients professionally. Be an example of recovery.
You cannot save your community while drowning yourself.
* * *
Resources
Crisis Support
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Call or text 988
Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741
Trevor Project (LGBTQ+ youth): 1-866-488-7386
LGBT National Hotline: 1-888-843-4564
Substance Use Treatment
SAMHSA National Helpline: 1-800-662-4357 (free, confidential, 24/7)
NAMI: 1-800-950-6264
Testing and Prevention
CDC Testing Locator: gettested.cdc.gov
NEXT Distro: nextdistro.org (free harm reduction supplies by mail)
National Harm Reduction Coalition: harmreduction.org
Reporting
FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center: ic3.gov
FBI Tips: tips.fbi.gov
National Center for Missing & Exploited Children: CyberTipline.org
Professional Support
Find monitoring program: Search “[Your state] [Your profession] health monitoring program”
Therapist directory: PsychologyToday.com (filter for LGBTQ+, addiction, OCD specialists)
* * *
Final Thoughts
I am writing this because I care about our community. I have watched too many talented, intelligent, compassionate LGBTQ+ professionals get caught in these ecosystems. The shame and secrecy that surround these experiences make them nearly invisible—to partners, to colleagues, to the broader community.
You do not need to understand the full system to leave it. You do not need to expose anyone to protect yourself. You do not need to save anyone to deserve help.
Just get yourself to safety. Then build the life and career you actually want.
Our community deserves better than exploitation masked as connection. You deserve better.
Please reach out. There are people who understand and want to help.
* * *
References
All citations referenced in this article are listed below in APA 7th Edition format.
Allen, J. L., & Oleson, K. C. (2013). Exploring shame, guilt, and risky substance use among sexual minority men and women. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(2), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030549
Bracken, B. (2021, November 18). 200M adult cam model, user records exposed in Stripchat breach. Threatpost. https://threatpost.com/adult-cam-model-user-records-exposed-stripchat-breach/176372/
Carrico, A. W., Horvath, K. J., Grov, C., Moskowitz, J. T., Pahwa, S., Pallikkuth, S., & Hirshfield, S. (2024). Substance use and HIV risk among sexual minority men: The role of minority stress and affect regulation. In L. A. J. Scott-Sheldon (Ed.), Health psychology perspectives on sexual minority men’s health. Springer.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Injection drug use and HIV risk. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/idu.html
Chen, Y., & Fang, L. (2023). Exploring the intersectionality of stigma and substance use help-seeking behaviours among LGBTQ+ individuals in the United States: A scoping review. Global Public Health, 18(1), 2277854. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2023.2277854
Cresci, S., Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A., & Tesconi, M. (2017). The paradigm-shift of social spambots: Evidence, theories, and tools for the arms race. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, 963–972.
Diachenko, V. (2021, November 15). Sex cam site Stripchat exposes user, model info on the web. Comparitech. https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/stripchat-data-leak/
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2024, January 17). Sextortion: A growing threat preying upon our nation’s teens. https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/sacramento/news/sextortion-a-growing-threat-preying-upon-our-nations-teens
Federal Trade Commission. (2023, February 9). Romance scammers’ favorite lies exposed. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/data-visualizations/data-spotlight/2023/02/romance-scammers-favorite-lies-exposed
Fitzpatrick, R. E., Rubenis, A. J., Gkolia, C., & Lubman, D. I. (2020). Cognitive deficits in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder: Independent contributions of dependence and intelligence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 209, 107920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107920
Hibbert, M. P., Hillis, A., Sherwood, J., & Brett, C. E. (2025). Mental health and drug use patterns among men who have sex with men (MSM) engaging in chemsex in the UK. Healthcare, 13(7), 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070719
Lasco, G., & Yu, V. G. (2023). “Party and play”: A scoping review of sexualized drug use among men who have sex with men. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 26, 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2228859
Lodge, W., Kelly, P. J. A., Napoleon, S., Plezia, S., Mimiaga, M. J., & Biello, K. B. (2024). Prevalence of methamphetamine use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Drug Policy, 123, 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104271
Maxwell, S., Shahmanesh, M., & Gafos, M. (2019). Chemsex behaviours among men who have sex with men: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Drug Policy, 63, 74–89.
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.
Mizoguchi, H., & Yamada, K. (2019). Methamphetamine use causes cognitive impairment and altered decision-making. Neurochemistry International, 124, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2018.12.019
National Center on Sexual Exploitation. (2024). Telegram unleashes a new era of exploitation. https://endsexualexploitation.org/telegram/
Poulios, A., et al. (2025). Prevalence of chemsex and sexualized drug use among men who have sex with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 267, 112534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112534
Rezaei, O., Ghiasvand, H., Higgs, P., Noroozi, A., Noroozi, M., Rezaei, F., & Armoon, B. (2020). Factors associated with injecting-related risk behaviors among people who inject drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 38(4), 420–437.
Sabrini, S., Wang, G. Y., Lin, J. C., Kirk, I. J., & Curley, L. E. (2019). Methamphetamine use and cognitive function: A systematic review of neuroimaging research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 194, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.041
SecureWorld. (2021, November 20). Adult cam site data exposure: ‘Digital and physical threat.’ https://www.secureworld.io/industry-news/stripchat-data-exposure
Weatherburn, P., Hickson, F., Reid, D., Torres-Rueda, S., & Bourne, A. (2017). Motivations and values associated with combining sex and illicit drugs (‘chemsex’) among gay men in South London: Findings from a qualitative study. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 93(3), 203–206.
* * *
Professional Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, legal advice, or individual treatment recommendations. If you are experiencing exploitation, substance use problems, or mental health crisis, please consult with appropriate licensed professionals and law enforcement as needed.
